Frustrated with AI assistance in app development

@Skyler
Indeed, those ‘no-code’ claims often rely on restricted platforms with limited functionality.

You typed ‘sexisting’ instead of ‘existing’.

Noor said:
You typed ‘sexisting’ instead of ‘existing’.

I’ve read that such errors grab attention, demonstrating AI’s ability to handle text. :joy:

As an experienced developer, I find AI assistants highly productive but require experience for best results. Always review AI-generated code thoroughly.

Consider using Cursor and Claude; they may provide better outcomes.

Wylder said:
Consider using Cursor and Claude; they may provide better outcomes.

I tried Claude but found it similarly unhelpful with my task.

@Drew
I find this task straightforward enough that a junior developer could handle it, yet I still see limitations with LLMs.

Skyler said:
@Drew
I find this task straightforward enough that a junior developer could handle it, yet I still see limitations with LLMs.

Using Copilot effectively involves providing context, with the best feature being its auto-suggestions!

Wylder said:
Consider using Cursor and Claude; they may provide better outcomes.

You can integrate Claude with GitHub Copilot for improved results.

You might need a more specialized tool for coding tasks rather than a generic one.

Remy said:
You might need a more specialized tool for coding tasks rather than a generic one.

I found Claude to be unsuitable for my task, despite its capabilities.