@Skyler
Indeed, those ‘no-code’ claims often rely on restricted platforms with limited functionality.
You typed ‘sexisting’ instead of ‘existing’.
Noor said:
You typed ‘sexisting’ instead of ‘existing’.
I’ve read that such errors grab attention, demonstrating AI’s ability to handle text.
As an experienced developer, I find AI assistants highly productive but require experience for best results. Always review AI-generated code thoroughly.
Consider using Cursor and Claude; they may provide better outcomes.
Wylder said:
Consider using Cursor and Claude; they may provide better outcomes.
I tried Claude but found it similarly unhelpful with my task.
@Drew
I find this task straightforward enough that a junior developer could handle it, yet I still see limitations with LLMs.
Skyler said:
@Drew
I find this task straightforward enough that a junior developer could handle it, yet I still see limitations with LLMs.
Using Copilot effectively involves providing context, with the best feature being its auto-suggestions!
Wylder said:
Consider using Cursor and Claude; they may provide better outcomes.
You can integrate Claude with GitHub Copilot for improved results.
You might need a more specialized tool for coding tasks rather than a generic one.
Remy said:
You might need a more specialized tool for coding tasks rather than a generic one.
I found Claude to be unsuitable for my task, despite its capabilities.